Hierarchical Technology Foresight Framework / (Record no. 8896)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 07858nam a22002537a 4500
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 210211b2018 a|||f mb|| 00| 0 eng d
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Original cataloging agency EG-CaNU
Transcribing agency EG-CaNU
041 0# - Language Code
Language code of text eng
Language code of abstract eng
082 ## - DEWEY DECIMAL CLASSIFICATION NUMBER
Classification number 658.4
100 0# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Shady Radwan
245 1# - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Hierarchical Technology Foresight Framework /
Statement of responsibility, etc. Shady Radwan
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2018
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent 82 p.
Other physical details ill.
Dimensions 21 cm.
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE
Materials specified Supervisor: Tarek Khalil
502 ## - Dissertation Note
Dissertation type Thesis (M.A.)—Nile University, Egypt, 2018 .
504 ## - Bibliography
Bibliography "Includes bibliographical references"
505 0# - Contents
Formatted contents note Contents:<br/>1. Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1<br/>1.1. Preface ................................................................................................................. 1<br/>1.2. Thesis outline........................................................................................................ 2<br/>2. Technology foresight ................................................................................................... 4<br/>2.1. What is technology foresight? ............................................................................... 4<br/>2.2. Technology foresight from different perspectives ................................................. 9<br/>2.3. The introduction of logical lenses ........................................................................ 10<br/>2.3.1. Context of technology foresight: ................................................................... 11<br/>2.3.2. Technology foresight concepts: .................................................................... 14<br/>2.3.3. Technology foresight tactics: ........................................................................ 20<br/>2.4. Summary of chapter 2 ........................................................................................ 25<br/>3. Research problem & objectives ................................................................................. 26<br/>3.1. Problem statement .............................................................................................. 26<br/>3.2. Research objectives: .......................................................................................... 26<br/>3.3. Research questions: ........................................................................................... 26<br/>3.4. Research significance ......................................................................................... 27<br/>3.5. Research limitations: .......................................................................................... 27<br/>4. Research methodology ............................................................................................. 28<br/>5. Framework synthesis ................................................................................................ 31<br/>5.1. Framework outline .............................................................................................. 31<br/>5.2. Framework population ........................................................................................ 32<br/>5.2.1. Contextual layer: TF as a policy making instrument ..................................... 33<br/>5.2.2. Conceptual layer: TF as a process ............................................................... 34<br/>5.2.3. Tactical layer: TF as a project ...................................................................... 38<br/>5.2.4. Preliminary design of the proposed framework ............................................ 39<br/>5.3. Enhancing framework consistency ..................................................................... 40<br/>iv<br/>5.4. Framework dynamics .......................................................................................... 42<br/>5.5. Framework synthesis conclusion ........................................................................ 44<br/>6. Framework testing (Case study) ............................................................................... 46<br/>6.1. “Egypt Leaps” TF Exercise ................................................................................. 47<br/>6.2. Mapping case study onto the framework ............................................................ 49<br/>6.2.1. Mapping using layers and phases ................................................................ 50<br/>6.2.2. Mapping using inter-layers dynamics ........................................................... 52<br/>6.3. Analysis of mapping results ................................................................................ 55<br/>6.3.1. Analysis of mapping results - layers and phases ......................................... 55<br/>6.3.2. Analysis of mapping results - inter-layers dynamics ..................................... 57<br/>6.4. Concluding results .............................................................................................. 58<br/>7. Conclusions & recommendation ................................................................................ 60<br/>7.1. Summary & conclusions ..................................................................................... 60<br/>7.2. Future work ......................................................................................................... 62<br/>8. References ...............................
520 3# - Abstract
Abstract Abstract:<br/>Technology foresight is an important practice currently embraced by a lot of governments in order to tackle future challenges imposed by the rapid development of advanced technology. It has been practiced in developed countries since the 1970’s. Yet the current state of its related scientific literature is still immature. Technology foresight literature handles the practice as one monolithic activity, despite the fact that it is an expansive and a complex practice. This immaturity of technology foresight theory has been selected by this research work as the foundation of its research problem.<br/>As a first step the research work proposed three perspectives through which technology foresight practice can be viewed. These perspectives are referred to in this thesis as logical lenses. These logical lenses are used in reviewing related literature and categorizing the issues within foresight practice as described in the literature.<br/>The three logical lenses are called; contextual, conceptual, and tactical. The contextual logical lens views technology foresight from a high-level perspective, in terms of interaction between the technology foresight life cycle and the policy making life cycle. The conceptual logical lens focuses on the technology foresight life cycle, in terms of the phases that a technology foresight exercise follows in order to provide its outcomes. The tactical logical lens focuses on technology foresight from a low-level perspective. It focuses on the tactical aspects of technology foresight exercises.<br/>The research work then poses the following research question: “How can the three proposed logical lenses (contextual, conceptual, and tactical) be used to develop a hierarchical framework that describes the dynamics of technology foresight practice?” The research work answers this question by proposing a consolidated hierarchical framework to describe the technology foresight practice using the proposed logical lenses.<br/>A technology foresight case study that is already in action in Egypt supported by international consultancy groups is then chosen to test how well the proposed framework fits a real-life exercise. This is done by mapping the case study onto the proposed framework. The results of this mapping activity is discussed in this thesis. The mapping step shows good coherency between the proposed framework and the chosen case study.
546 ## - Language Note
Language Note Text in English, abstracts in English.
650 #4 - Subject
Subject MOT
655 #7 - Index Term-Genre/Form
Source of term NULIB
focus term Dissertation, Academic
690 ## - Subject
School MOT
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Source of classification or shelving scheme Dewey Decimal Classification
Koha item type Thesis
650 #4 - Subject
-- 309
655 #7 - Index Term-Genre/Form
-- 187
690 ## - Subject
-- 309
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Home library Current library Date acquired Total Checkouts Full call number Date last seen Price effective from Koha item type
    Dewey Decimal Classification     Main library Main library 02/11/2021   658.4 / S.R.H 02/11/2021 02/11/2021 Thesis