Image from Google Jackets

Effects of Business-level strategies on the Competitiveness of the Food and Beverage Industries / Hajar Mohammad Alhosseiny

By: Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Summary language: English Publication details: 2019Description: 143 p. ill. 21 cmSubject(s): Genre/Form: DDC classification:
  • 658.4
Contents:
Contents: Chapter One: Introduction……………………………………………………….…………………..1 Chapter Two: Competitive advantage and strategies ……..………………….………..2 2.1. Competitive advantage ……………………………………………………………………….…..2 2.2. Determinants of Competitive advantage …………………………………………….…..4 2.3. Business strategy …………………………………………………………………………….………5 2.3.1 Business-level competitive strategies …………………………………..……………….5 2.4. Porter’s generic strategies model……………………………………….……………………6 2.4.1 Kinds of Business-level strategies………………………………….………………………7 A. Cost-leadership strategy …………………………………………………………………………..8 A.1. Approaches to achieve cost reduction advantage ……………………………….…10 A.2. Advantages of Cost leadership strategy…………………………….……………………12 A.3. Risks of Cost-leadership ……………………………………………………………….….……14 B. Differentiation strategy …………………………………………………………………………..14 B.1. Ways to achieve Differentiation …………………………………………………………..16 B.2. Ways for sustaining Differentiation ……………………………….……………………..19 B.3. Risks of Differentiation ………………………………………………….……………….…….20 B.4. Advantages of Differentiation …………………………………….………………….….…20 C. Focus strategies ……………………………………………………………….……………….….…20 v C.1. Advantages of Focus strategies……………………………………………………….…...21 C.2. Disadvantages of Focus strategies……………………………………………………..…21 D. Hybrid strategy ……………………………………………………………………..……….…..….22 2.2.2. Enhancing core competency……………………………………..……………….……..24 2.2.3. Developing VRIO resources…………………………………………..……………….….25 2.2.4 The response to PEST factors………………………………………………………….….26 Chapter Three: Problem and methodology…………………………..………..….……..28 3.1. Research problem and question…………………………………………………….…….28 3.2. Research Hypothesis…………………………………………………………………………….28 3.3. Research Objective…………………………………………………………..….……….……..28 3.4. Research Significance……………………………………………………………………..…….29 3.5. Research Model……………………………………………………………………………………29 3.6. Variables and Methodology…………………………………….…………………..……….29 Chapter Four: Data analysis and interpretation………………………..….……………33 4.1. Data analysis………………………………………………………………………..…….………..34 4.2. Data interpretation…………………………………………………………………...…..…….47 Chapter Five: Results and conclusions………………………………….…..…….………..58 5.1. Results and Conclusions………………………………………………………..…..………..58 5.2. Recommendations…………………………………………………………….…...…………..59 5.3. Research Limitations and further research………………….….……..……….…..59 References…………………………………………………………………………………..…………….
Dissertation note: Thesis (M.A.)—Nile University, Egypt, 2019 . Abstract: Abstract: Adopting an appropriate competitive strategy by any firm is a crucial issue since it determines the approach the firm has to follow in order to achieve sustainable competitive advantage. The objective of this research work is to find out the best-practice competitive strategy in order to be adopted by the firms in the Egyptian Food and Beverage sector so that it can achieve sustainable competitive advantage and join the successful and good profit-making firms of this sector globally. Porter’s model was taken as a basis of this research work. The model suggests that there are two main strategies firms can adopt either: Low Cost-leadership strategy or Differentiation strategy. In the Cost-leadership strategy, a firm strives to be low-cost producer of traditional products. On the other hand, in the Differentiation strategy, a firm is to produce products with unique features that are not imitated by other competitors and hence are sold only by this firm. Porter’s model also showed that firms can combine both strategies together forming a new strategy that can be called Hybrid or Integrated strategy. The current study, being a survey desk research, chose to investigate the Food and Beverage sector as it is considered the world’s biggest industries and the largest contributing sector in the world’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Due to the availability of data, the research work encompasses the top twenty-seven (27) large food and beverage firms in the U.S and Canada. Eight years data about these firms have been collected and analyzed. Such a period is assumed to be a sufficient time to judge their status considering their sustainable competitive advantage. Several variables affect achieving competitive advantage, the most influential variable is the business-level strategy adopted by the firm. The sustainable competitive advantage of a firm is judged by studying the companies’ performance throughout the years with the adopted strategy. Analyzing sales and revenues of the companies’ accounting statements enabled the researcher to estimate the percentage of market share of each firm as a measure of the success of its strategy. Results showed that Differentiation strategy adopters have achieved the highest market share, and got a sustainable advanced ranking in the global competition.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Status Date due Barcode
Thesis Thesis Main library 658.4/ H.A.E (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan

Supervisor: Mohamed Awny

Thesis (M.A.)—Nile University, Egypt, 2019 .

"Includes bibliographical references"

Contents:
Chapter One: Introduction……………………………………………………….…………………..1
Chapter Two: Competitive advantage and strategies ……..………………….………..2
2.1. Competitive advantage ……………………………………………………………………….…..2
2.2. Determinants of Competitive advantage …………………………………………….…..4
2.3. Business strategy …………………………………………………………………………….………5
2.3.1 Business-level competitive strategies …………………………………..……………….5
2.4. Porter’s generic strategies model……………………………………….……………………6
2.4.1 Kinds of Business-level strategies………………………………….………………………7
A. Cost-leadership strategy …………………………………………………………………………..8
A.1. Approaches to achieve cost reduction advantage ……………………………….…10
A.2. Advantages of Cost leadership strategy…………………………….……………………12
A.3. Risks of Cost-leadership ……………………………………………………………….….……14
B. Differentiation strategy …………………………………………………………………………..14
B.1. Ways to achieve Differentiation …………………………………………………………..16
B.2. Ways for sustaining Differentiation ……………………………….……………………..19
B.3. Risks of Differentiation ………………………………………………….……………….…….20
B.4. Advantages of Differentiation …………………………………….………………….….…20
C. Focus strategies ……………………………………………………………….……………….….…20
v
C.1. Advantages of Focus strategies……………………………………………………….…...21
C.2. Disadvantages of Focus strategies……………………………………………………..…21
D. Hybrid strategy ……………………………………………………………………..……….…..….22
2.2.2. Enhancing core competency……………………………………..……………….……..24
2.2.3. Developing VRIO resources…………………………………………..……………….….25
2.2.4 The response to PEST factors………………………………………………………….….26
Chapter Three: Problem and methodology…………………………..………..….……..28
3.1. Research problem and question…………………………………………………….…….28
3.2. Research Hypothesis…………………………………………………………………………….28
3.3. Research Objective…………………………………………………………..….……….……..28
3.4. Research Significance……………………………………………………………………..…….29
3.5. Research Model……………………………………………………………………………………29
3.6. Variables and Methodology…………………………………….…………………..……….29
Chapter Four: Data analysis and interpretation………………………..….……………33
4.1. Data analysis………………………………………………………………………..…….………..34
4.2. Data interpretation…………………………………………………………………...…..…….47
Chapter Five: Results and conclusions………………………………….…..…….………..58
5.1. Results and Conclusions………………………………………………………..…..………..58
5.2. Recommendations…………………………………………………………….…...…………..59
5.3. Research Limitations and further research………………….….……..……….…..59
References…………………………………………………………………………………..…………….

Abstract:
Adopting an appropriate competitive strategy by any firm is a crucial issue since it determines the approach the firm has to follow in order to achieve sustainable competitive advantage. The objective of this research work is to find out the best-practice competitive strategy in order to be adopted by the firms in the Egyptian Food and Beverage sector so that it can achieve sustainable competitive advantage and join the successful and good profit-making firms of this sector globally. Porter’s model was taken as a basis of this research work. The model suggests that there are two main strategies firms can adopt either: Low Cost-leadership strategy or Differentiation strategy. In the Cost-leadership strategy, a firm strives to be low-cost producer of traditional products. On the other hand, in the Differentiation strategy, a firm is to produce products with unique features that are not imitated by other competitors and hence are sold only by this firm. Porter’s model also showed that firms can combine both strategies together forming a new strategy that can be called Hybrid or Integrated strategy. The current study, being a survey desk research, chose to investigate the Food and Beverage sector as it is considered the world’s biggest industries and the largest contributing sector in the world’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Due to the availability of data, the research work encompasses the top twenty-seven (27) large food and beverage firms in the U.S and Canada. Eight years data about these firms have been collected and analyzed. Such a period is assumed to be a sufficient time to judge their status considering their sustainable competitive advantage. Several variables affect achieving competitive advantage, the most influential variable is the business-level strategy adopted by the firm. The sustainable competitive advantage of a firm is judged by studying the companies’ performance throughout the years with the adopted strategy. Analyzing sales and revenues of the companies’ accounting statements enabled the researcher to estimate the percentage of market share of each firm as a measure of the success of its strategy. Results showed that Differentiation strategy adopters have achieved the highest market share, and got a sustainable advanced ranking in the global competition.

Text in English, abstracts in English.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.